Warning (2): fopen(/www/htdocs/w008552b/diaphanes/dev/f-is/htdocs/app/tmp/cache/models/cake_model_default_kontakt_rezensionen) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory [CORE/cake/libs/file.php, line 152]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /www/htdocs/w008552b/diaphanes/dev/f-is/htdocs/cake/libs/debugger.php:686) [CORE/cake/libs/controller/components/cookie.php, line 376]
diaphanes

Nutzerkonto

Christoph Schenker: Transdisciplinarity and Condensed Knowledge
Transdisciplinarity and Condensed Knowledge
(S. 125 – 132)
p€ 7,95

Christoph Schenker

Transdisciplinarity and Condensed Knowledge
Response to Sabine Maasen

PDF, 8 Seiten

  • Wissenschaftsgeschichte
  • Epistemologie
  • Wissen
  • Interdisziplinarität

Meine Sprache
Deutsch

Aktuell ausgewählte Inhalte
Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch

Ändern

Christoph Schenker

war bis 2022 Professor für Gegenwartskunst und Philosophie der Kunst an der Zürcher Hochschule der Künste ZHdK. Von 2005 bis 2022 war er Leiter des Institute for Contemporary Art Research (IFCAR) mit Forschungsschwerpunkt in artistic research. Er lebt in Zürich.

Christoph Schenker (Hg.): Inventory and Hinge
b€ 35,00 p OA
Jens Badura (Hg.), Selma Dubach (Hg.), ...: Künstlerische Forschung. Ein Handbuch
b€ 45,00 p€ 45,00
Weitere Texte von Christoph Schenker bei diaphanes
Hartmut von Sass (Hg.): Between / Beyond / Hybrid
b€ 30,00 p€ 30,00

Hartmut von Sass (Hg.)

Between / Beyond / Hybrid
New Essays on Transdisciplinarity

Broschur, 176 Seiten

PDF, 176 Seiten

Everyone calls for it, but no one knows what the subject matter of this call really is—transdisciplinarity. After a period in which it went from an academic invitation to a demand urgently to be fulfilled, the concept has recently been losing its pull. High time to approach the concept anew and in a new form.

 

This volume collects prominent voices in the debate on transdisciplinarity in a transdisciplinary manner. Its coincidence of content and form in presenting main papers and critical replies to them from a different discipline allows for a vivid discussion and new insights. These stylistically and thematically divergent contributions are linked by reservations about transdisciplinarity as an allround intellectual weapon and the conviction that its programmatic weight could be regained by approaching the subject from the margins—transdisciplinarity where it breaks down, fails, comes to an end. Unravelling transdisciplinarity’s contours by clarifying its limits.

Inhalt